by Robert L. Bever
Over
the last decade, many people, especially seniors, have been encouraged
and even pressured into creating a "Living Trust" and
placing all of their assets into such an entity. Literature and
seminars discussing the topic can be found almost weekly in any
community. The promoters of living trusts list a number of "alleged"
advantages and, of course, are then ready to prepare the living
trust for a sizable fee.
This
article will attempt to first address or respond to each purported
advantage; secondly discuss some additional drawbacks or problems
with a living trust; and then conclude with some situations where
a living trust is advisable.
A. ADVANTAGES?
1.
Taxes - Probably the most important
misrepresentation which can be made involving a living trust is
that it will "save you taxes" at your death. The vast
majority of living trusts created are revocable trusts,
which means that the settlor (ie: creator of the trust-you) can
change or even eliminate the trust at any time. This is generally
preferable so that if you later need property from the trust or
change your mind as to who will receive the property at your death,
you can accomplish it just like you can change a will.
If
a living trust is revocable, however, there is absolutely
no tax savings whether the property is in the trust or if
it is still owned outright. There are two types of taxes at death,
ie: federal "estate tax" to the U.S. government, and
Indiana "inheritance tax". Both of these will apply
equally to property owned either personally or in a revocable
living trust. There are exclusions and credits to avoid both taxes,
such as no tax for bequests to spouses and the unified credit
which currently allows an individual to bequest up to $650,000
at death free from the federal estate tax, but none of these are
affected by a revocable living trust.
(Point:
There are trusts known as "unified credit trusts" which
can be created to take effect at your death either through your
will or through an irrevocable trust and which do save a great
deal of tax for couples with property in excess of $650,000, but
these are not the purpose of a standard revocable living trust
and will be the topic of a subsequent article.)
2.
Immediate Access To Property - Advocates
of living trusts will convince a person that a beneficiary in
a will must wait over a year to receive any distribution from
an estate and that a beneficiary in a trust has access to money
immediately. While it is true final distributions from an estate
can take a few months, there are a number of ways to get money
to a surviving spouse or child immediately. In Indiana, there
exists a family allowance of $15,000 which can be reached immediately;
one can petition for a "partial distribution" in order
to meet any every day needs (which I have never had rejected);
and cash flow financing can be pre-arranged through life insurance
or pension benefits which provide a specific beneficiary apart
from going through a probate estate.
3.
Privacy - A third point made by speakers
for living trusts stress the advantages of privacy within a living
trust. Let me first say that the courts do not publish the amount
of your estate or the names of your beneficiaries in the local
newspaper; and I know few people who make a habit of reviewing
the public records at the courthouse. However, if privacy is a
concern, Indiana does allow unsupervised administration of a probate
estate, with the consent of beneficiaries, which eliminates much
of the information going through the public records. An estate
is still opened and a personal representative is appointed to
handle the final affairs, but a detailed listing of property and
beneficiaries is not required. Consequently, much of the same
privacy found in a living trust can still be accomplished with
a Will.
4.
Avoiding "Probate" and Costs
- Listening to speakers at a living trust seminar, one would think
going through "probate" is worse than the death, itself.
First of all, let's understand what "probate" actually
includes. To "probate" a will is simply having your
personal representative (a person you select in your will) making
sure your final bills are paid and that the beneficiaries you
name in your Will receive the property you designate in your Will.
Often
times, audiences are convinced that in a living trust nothing
must be done following a death and no work or cost is required
to carry out the terms of the trust. I wonder if living trust
speakers believe that elves come into our homes at night to get
the property from a living trust to the named beneficiaries within
the trust?
The
point I am making is that the same type of work will be required
whether the personal representative in your Will is getting property
turned over to the Will beneficiaries or the trustee in the trust
is getting property delivered to the beneficiaries in the trust.
Other work is also identical, ie: bills from your estate must
still be paid; claims against your estate can still be made; inheritance
tax returns for Indiana must still be completed and filed; if
sufficient property, a federal estate tax return must still be
filed; and beneficiaries must still have property transferred
to their names. And much of the work will need the same legal
assistance used with a Will.
This
discussion brings us to the topic of "costs". We hear
every day how "probate fees" will take away the vast
majority of your estate if you do not use a living trust. Let's
look specifically at what "costs" these could include:
(a)
Taxes - we have already discussed how
there are no additional taxes with probate than with a living
trust.
(b)
Probate Fees - Some states charge a separate
probate fee based upon a percentage of an estate going through
probate. Indiana has no such fee other than a nominal filing fee
of $100 to open an estate.
(c)
Personal Representative Fee - The person
you name in your will to serve as personal representative to handle
your final affairs and deliver property to a beneficiary is allowed
to claim a fee. However, if you name a family member (ie: spouse)
who is also a beneficiary, they will often waive this fee since
it would reduce the amount they are going to get through the Will
anyway. Why pay income tax on this income if they can receive
it free as a beneficiary? Secondly, whomever is serving as the
trustee in your living trust (probably a named successor trustee
if you served as your own trustee during your life), can also
claim a fee to perform their job.
(d)
Attorney Fees - Finally, there are
likely to be attorney fees incurred with a probate estate. I will
not deny this fact for the legal services provided; however, as
pointed out above, similar attorney fees will likely also
be required following death with a living trust. Contrary
to presumed belief, the necessary transfers do not occur automatically.
Bank accounts, real estate, car titles and corporate stock, will
all need to be transferred from the trust to the beneficiaries
and the same tax returns will still be necessary. This will all
incur a cost.
In
addition, even if the attorney fees in a probate proceeding are
slightly more than the attorney fees at death in a living trust,
one must compare the initial costs when you create a living trust.
It almost becomes do I pay now or do I pay later! In general,
it is dramatically less expensive to prepare a will than to prepare
a living trust (and if done properly, as discussed below, to transfer
all of your assets at the time into the trust). Consequently,
in conclusion, the cost savings are generally not what one is
led to believe.
B. DISADVANTAGES?
In
addition to the above responses to alleged advantages, some other
items need to be kept in mind on a living trust.
1.
New Ownership - Probably the biggest
misconception in conjunction with a living trust is that the only
thing you must do is to sign a document entitled "Living
Trust". While this might technically create your trust, it
serves no purpose unless you follow up with actual transfers of
your property into the trust. This includes Warranty
Deeds on your home or other real estate; transfers of your bank
accounts into a new account in the name of the trust; transfers
of car titles; notification to all corporations to transfer your
stocks into the name of the trust; and any other work necessary
to eliminate individual ownership in any property.
As
you might suspect, this requires a great deal of work and cost
if done correctly. Secondly, you must remember when you sell or
buy new property that it must always be owned by the trust. In
order to accomplish the initial goal of the trust, you cannot
own anything individually again until your death. Otherwise, you
will still need a will which results in probate and which will
defeat the purpose of the trust, anyway.
While
some people may not mind the additional paperwork made necessary
by owning everything in trust for the rest of their lives, I have
found it very confusing for some seniors and simply not worth
any minimal benefit of a living trust. As you should know, with
the use of a Will only, you continue to own everything personally
until your death at which time the terms of your will come into
effect.
2.
Bank Loans - In the event you need
to borrow money following the creation of a living trust and need
to use your property as collateral, some banks make it quite difficult
to borrow against your trust property. Because of the new ownership
discussed above, banks can be reluctant to use trust property
as collateral, or at least require a great deal more paperwork
to accomplish a simple loan.
3.
Income Tax Returns- At this point, the
holder of a living trust can still report all income on their
own income tax return using their own social security number.
Depending on the type of property in trust, however, and if you
name someone else as trustee, a new tax identification
number can be required which will require a separate tax return
(additional cost?) in addition to your own tax return in every
year for the remainder of your life.
C.
USES OF LIVING TRUSTS
The
purpose of this article is not to say that living trusts
should never be used. In certain situations they are probably
the best document. If one is not capable of handling their own
financial affairs or property, either because of a disability
or simply do not wish to be bothered with the work, a revocable
living trust which names another trusted person as trustee to
handle the funds or property will accomplish two important tasks.
It gives that other person the authority to control the property,
while at the same time setting forth the settlor's intention of
what should happen to their property at death.
For
others, if you believe the advantages are still worthwhile in
spite of any drawbacks described herein, a living trust can still
be used and either myself or my colleagues are willing to prepare
them for you. Just be sure that all of the necessary associated
work, ie: getting your property into the trust, is also accomplished
at the same time.
I
hope this article has been of some assistance and just consider
all options, including the simple Will, while pursuing your estate
planning needs.
|